<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jasarien.Com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasarien.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasarien.com</link>
	<description>A Developing Software Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 13:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Quake 4 + MS Office 2007 = Apocalypse by Jeobrien</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2007/05/11/quake-4-ms-office-2007-apocalypse/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeobrien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2007/05/11/quake-4-ms-office-2007-apocalypse/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Just registered to post the fix for this: Rename the folder Office 12 inside the C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\ folder to Office 11, then start the install. When it's done rename office 11 back to 12 so office will still work. I'm not sure how these two programs got mixed up but good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just registered to post the fix for this: Rename the folder Office 12 inside the C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\ folder to Office 11, then start the install. When it&#8217;s done rename office 11 back to 12 so office will still work. I&#8217;m not sure how these two programs got mixed up but good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Is It OK Online? by Jasarien</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/05/07/why-is-it-ok-online/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasarien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/?p=206#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Its a satirical piece of writing and wasn't meant to be taken so seriously.

The point I was attempting to get at is that it ISN'T considered a problem in society when this sort of thing is online, but if it were to happen in the real world, it would be questionable behaviour. Are you telling me that if this was all happening in the flesh that you wouldn't consider it some kind of invasion of privacy?

It's because it's online and not in the physical sense that it isn't such an invasion of privacy. You can escape from Facebook and Twitter. You wouldn't be able to if it were happening on your doorstep. This post is about what it would be like IF it were to happen in real life, and why it's considered OK to do it online.

It wasn't a personal attack on anybody, but a rather general questioning of why the internet is evolving into a culture where everything everyone does affects everyone else. I don't think anyone would be interested in what I'm eating for breakfast, therefore I don't make a Twitter post explaining it. I'm not interested in what everyone else has had for breakfast, therefore I don't go looking at people's Twitters to find out. But there are those on the web that can't live without knowing whether or not some guy on the other side of the world is enjoying their waffles. Why does it matter?

I know the lines saying "Who’s sad enough to..." etc are a bit harsh, but they're the extreme circumstances. They're the stereotype. It's not a personal attack on anybody.

Like with the picture thing - again, the extreme case, where people who have public profiles are showing pictures of people who are not them, and linking to a page which contains a lot of personal information. They're asking for identity theft. You on the other hand have a private profile, its not like you're parading pictures of me around to the populace of the planet, like some people are with other people's photos.

Facebook does have privacy control to some degree, of which I am grateful. But not everyone uses them. Some people think its fine to go around letting any old Tom, Dick and Harry view their pictures, know their e-mail address and initiate contact with them. You wouldn't go up to some random person in the street and offer to show them your entire photo collection. Yet that's what some people are doing online. At least the people you're showing your pictures to are people you know. Notice the post starts with someone you don't know knocking your door? No, you'd reject them, just like you rejected that girl from school who tried to add you to Facebook.

You know my feelings about Facebook, and the whole Social Networking palaver, and this post doesn't say anything that I haven't said to you before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a satirical piece of writing and wasn&#8217;t meant to be taken so seriously.</p>
<p>The point I was attempting to get at is that it ISN&#8217;T considered a problem in society when this sort of thing is online, but if it were to happen in the real world, it would be questionable behaviour. Are you telling me that if this was all happening in the flesh that you wouldn&#8217;t consider it some kind of invasion of privacy?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because it&#8217;s online and not in the physical sense that it isn&#8217;t such an invasion of privacy. You can escape from Facebook and Twitter. You wouldn&#8217;t be able to if it were happening on your doorstep. This post is about what it would be like IF it were to happen in real life, and why it&#8217;s considered OK to do it online.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a personal attack on anybody, but a rather general questioning of why the internet is evolving into a culture where everything everyone does affects everyone else. I don&#8217;t think anyone would be interested in what I&#8217;m eating for breakfast, therefore I don&#8217;t make a Twitter post explaining it. I&#8217;m not interested in what everyone else has had for breakfast, therefore I don&#8217;t go looking at people&#8217;s Twitters to find out. But there are those on the web that can&#8217;t live without knowing whether or not some guy on the other side of the world is enjoying their waffles. Why does it matter?</p>
<p>I know the lines saying &#8220;Who’s sad enough to&#8230;&#8221; etc are a bit harsh, but they&#8217;re the extreme circumstances. They&#8217;re the stereotype. It&#8217;s not a personal attack on anybody.</p>
<p>Like with the picture thing - again, the extreme case, where people who have public profiles are showing pictures of people who are not them, and linking to a page which contains a lot of personal information. They&#8217;re asking for identity theft. You on the other hand have a private profile, its not like you&#8217;re parading pictures of me around to the populace of the planet, like some people are with other people&#8217;s photos.</p>
<p>Facebook does have privacy control to some degree, of which I am grateful. But not everyone uses them. Some people think its fine to go around letting any old Tom, Dick and Harry view their pictures, know their e-mail address and initiate contact with them. You wouldn&#8217;t go up to some random person in the street and offer to show them your entire photo collection. Yet that&#8217;s what some people are doing online. At least the people you&#8217;re showing your pictures to are people you know. Notice the post starts with someone you don&#8217;t know knocking your door? No, you&#8217;d reject them, just like you rejected that girl from school who tried to add you to Facebook.</p>
<p>You know my feelings about Facebook, and the whole Social Networking palaver, and this post doesn&#8217;t say anything that I haven&#8217;t said to you before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Is It OK Online? by Sofie</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/05/07/why-is-it-ok-online/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Sofie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/?p=206#comment-199</guid>
		<description>alright... calm the fuck down. I'll delete all the pictures of you shall i?
Christ how about we just name this post, "Sofie is a boring loser who has nothing better to do than go on Facebook"

Thanks for making my day sooooooooooo much better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alright&#8230; calm the fuck down. I&#8217;ll delete all the pictures of you shall i?<br />
Christ how about we just name this post, &#8220;Sofie is a boring loser who has nothing better to do than go on Facebook&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for making my day sooooooooooo much better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why The Macbook Pro Makes A Decent Server by gumby325</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>gumby325</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much, that was helpful, cheers, Bev.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much, that was helpful, cheers, Bev.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why The Macbook Pro Makes A Decent Server by Jasarien</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasarien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Hey bev,

Good to know that you find my posts interesting!

There's tons of information on the web about using your Mac as a server. The best link I could find was http://macos-x-server.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

There seems to be a whole load of information about setting up the services on Mac OS X.
Have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey bev,</p>
<p>Good to know that you find my posts interesting!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s tons of information on the web about using your Mac as a server. The best link I could find was <a href="http://macos-x-server.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://macos-x-server.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page</a></p>
<p>There seems to be a whole load of information about setting up the services on Mac OS X.<br />
Have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why The Macbook Pro Makes A Decent Server by gumby325</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>gumby325</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/03/17/why-the-macbook-pro-makes-a-decent-server/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>This is what I'm trying to do. I'm new to mac, so getting use to the nuances still. Any additional (ie. how to) information would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers, Bev.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I&#8217;m trying to do. I&#8217;m new to mac, so getting use to the nuances still. Any additional (ie. how to) information would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Cheers, Bev.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dramatic Lemur, Reprise! by Davey</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/02/29/dramatic-lemur-reprise/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/02/29/dramatic-lemur-reprise/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>You might appreciate

http://www.sayagain.co.uk/b3tapix/images/lemurshock.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might appreciate</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sayagain.co.uk/b3tapix/images/lemurshock.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.sayagain.co.uk/b3tapix/images/lemurshock.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gundam 00! by Maxwellian</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/02/05/gundam-00/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxwellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/02/05/gundam-00/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Heehee Gundam Wing, the reason for my nickname :3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heehee Gundam Wing, the reason for my nickname :3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something I Should Have Done A Long Time Ago&#8230; by Jasarien</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/01/21/something-i-should-have-done-a-long-time-ago/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasarien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/01/21/something-i-should-have-done-a-long-time-ago/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I haven't tried Second Life since i had the iMac with the X1600. I can't say it ran too well on the X1600. It was playable, but the glitches were very noticeable.
Although I did play it a few times when i had the 7800GTX setup, and it seemed to run fine on there. Any crashes I had with it I attributed to Windows... there are a few blog posts around here detailing my troubles with that machine.

I would assume that the 8600M GT would be able to handle it graphically, it's a very capable card.

And as for Apple putting an 8800M GT in the newer MBP's I don't think that will happen. Apple made some processor enhancements to the MBP's during the time they were fitted with X1600's and the gfx chip wasn't upgraded until they moved them to the Santa Rosa platform.

It's always possible though. Maybe Steve likes Second Life and demands that a better graphics solution be put in the new MBP's.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried Second Life since i had the iMac with the X1600. I can&#8217;t say it ran too well on the X1600. It was playable, but the glitches were very noticeable.<br />
Although I did play it a few times when i had the 7800GTX setup, and it seemed to run fine on there. Any crashes I had with it I attributed to Windows&#8230; there are a few blog posts around here detailing my troubles with that machine.</p>
<p>I would assume that the 8600M GT would be able to handle it graphically, it&#8217;s a very capable card.</p>
<p>And as for Apple putting an 8800M GT in the newer MBP&#8217;s I don&#8217;t think that will happen. Apple made some processor enhancements to the MBP&#8217;s during the time they were fitted with X1600&#8217;s and the gfx chip wasn&#8217;t upgraded until they moved them to the Santa Rosa platform.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always possible though. Maybe Steve likes Second Life and demands that a better graphics solution be put in the new MBP&#8217;s&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Something I Should Have Done A Long Time Ago&#8230; by Davey</title>
		<link>http://jasarien.com/2008/01/21/something-i-should-have-done-a-long-time-ago/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasarien.com/2008/01/21/something-i-should-have-done-a-long-time-ago/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Did you ever try Second Life on that Macbook pro? I was considering getting one for travel, but I heard there's been ongoing stability issues with it (something to do with the nVidia driver), which put me off, and also I had no idea what the performance was like. Performance would definitely be the decider.

Though, AppleInsider mentioned yesterday that there'll be a CPU upgrade soon (the new Intel Penryn-based Core 2 Duos), in addition to the Macbook Air style touchpads they'll be getting too. I'm just hoping they upgrade the graphics chip to a 8800GT (or better) in the process. I hear the performance gains on the 8800's are a lot higher than the 8600's.

http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/01/21/next_gen_apple_macbook_pros_to_gain_multi_touch_trackpad.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever try Second Life on that Macbook pro? I was considering getting one for travel, but I heard there&#8217;s been ongoing stability issues with it (something to do with the nVidia driver), which put me off, and also I had no idea what the performance was like. Performance would definitely be the decider.</p>
<p>Though, AppleInsider mentioned yesterday that there&#8217;ll be a CPU upgrade soon (the new Intel Penryn-based Core 2 Duos), in addition to the Macbook Air style touchpads they&#8217;ll be getting too. I&#8217;m just hoping they upgrade the graphics chip to a 8800GT (or better) in the process. I hear the performance gains on the 8800&#8217;s are a lot higher than the 8600&#8217;s.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/01/21/next_gen_apple_macbook_pros_to_gain_multi_touch_trackpad.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/01/21/next_gen_apple_macbook_pros_to_gain_multi_touch_trackpad.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
